Pravind Jugnauth Refused to Answer Police in Phone-Tapping Probe

Former Mauritian Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth has refused to answer questions from investigators probing the alleged acquisition of phone-tapping equipment, according to a statement from Casernes Centrales — the headquarters of the Mauritius Police Force in Port Louis. The disclosure confirms what has been widely speculated: that Jugnauth, who led the country from 2017 until his electoral defeat in November 2024, has declined to cooperate with the ongoing inquiry into surveillance technology allegedly procured during his government's tenure. **What Is the Investigation About?** The case centres on the reported purchase of telephone interception or eavesdropping equipment — commonly known as phone-tapping technology — by the previous administration. Critics and opposition figures have long raised concerns that such tools could have been used to monitor political opponents, journalists, or civil society figures, raising serious questions about civil liberties and the rule of law in Mauritius. The investigation is being handled by the Mauritius Police Force, and the confirmation that a key suspect — a former head of government — has refused to engage with investigators marks a significant moment in what is already a politically sensitive case. **Jugnauth's Right to Silence** Under Mauritian law, as in most jurisdictions with British common law heritage, a person is not legally compelled to answer questions during a police inquiry. Refusing to respond to investigators is not, in itself, a criminal offence. However, such a refusal can carry political and legal weight as the case progresses, particularly if charges are eventually brought. Pravind Jugnauth leads the Militant Socialist Movement (MSM), which governed Mauritius for two consecutive terms before losing the November 2024 general election to the Alliance du Changement led by current Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam. **Why It Matters** The phone-tapping allegations strike at the heart of democratic governance. If state resources were used to purchase surveillance technology for political purposes, it would represent a serious abuse of power. The new government has signalled its intent to investigate alleged wrongdoing under the previous administration, and this probe is among the highest-profile inquiries currently underway. The refusal of a former prime minister to cooperate is likely to intensify public and parliamentary scrutiny of the case. Opposition voices may argue it demonstrates a lack of accountability, while Jugnauth's supporters could frame it as a politically motivated investigation. Further developments are expected as investigators determine next steps, which could include formal charges or the summoning of other witnesses connected to the alleged equipment purchase. Source: Le Defi Media