Misley Mandarin Vows to Stay on Chagos Island After Court Ruling
Misley Mandarin says the group will not leave Ile du Coin in the Chagos archipelago despite an appeal court ruling issued on 12 November.
A group calling itself Misley Mandarin has defiantly declared it will remain on Ile du Coin, one of the islands in the Chagos archipelago, following a court ruling that went against them.
The Court of Appeal of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) delivered its decision on 12 November, ordering the removal of Chagossians who had returned to the islands without authorisation. Misley Mandarin, one of the groups affected, described the judgment as deeply disappointing but said it had no intention of complying with any order to leave.
The Chagos Islands, officially known as the British Indian Ocean Territory, sit roughly 1,500 kilometres south of the Indian subcontinent. The islands were controversially depopulated by British authorities between the late 1960s and early 1970s to make way for a joint UK-US military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island in the chain. Many of the displaced Chagossians were originally from Mauritius, and the issue remains deeply tied to Mauritian politics and identity.
Some Chagossians and their descendants have attempted to return to the outer islands of the archipelago in recent years as part of a broader campaign to reclaim their right to their homeland. Ile du Coin, located on the Peros Banhos atoll, is one of the outer islands where such returns have taken place.
The BIOT Court of Appeal ruling on 12 November reversed an earlier decision that had been more favourable to the returnees, ordering that four Chagossians be expelled from the islands. Misley Mandarin represents at least some of those affected by the ruling.
Despite the legal setback, the group has made clear it views the decision as unjust and will not voluntarily depart. The standoff raises immediate questions about how British authorities will enforce the ruling, and whether any physical removal will take place.
What this means: This case sits at the intersection of colonial history, international law and the long-running dispute between Mauritius and the United Kingdom over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands. Mauritius has consistently argued that the excision of the Chagos Islands before independence in 1968 was illegal under international law. A landmark International Court of Justice advisory opinion in 2019 backed Mauritius on that point. Sovereignty talks between Mauritius and the UK have been ongoing, though no final agreement has been signed. The fate of Chagossians who have physically returned to the outer islands adds a human dimension to what has largely been a diplomatic and legal dispute. Their refusal to leave puts pressure on both the British authorities and the broader negotiation process.
Source: Le Defi Media
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the Chagossians and why were they removed from the islands?β
The Chagossians are the indigenous people of the Chagos archipelago, many of whom have roots in Mauritius. Between the late 1960s and early 1970s, British authorities forcibly displaced the entire population to make way for a joint UK-US military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island. The displacement has been widely condemned and is at the heart of an ongoing legal and political dispute.
What did the BIOT Court of Appeal decide on 12 November?β
The Court of Appeal of the British Indian Ocean Territory overturned an earlier ruling that had been favourable to Chagossians who had returned to the outer islands without authorisation. The November 12 decision ordered the removal of four Chagossians, including those associated with the Misley Mandarin group on Ile du Coin.
What is Mauritius's position on the Chagos Islands?β
Mauritius claims sovereignty over the Chagos archipelago, arguing that its excision from Mauritian territory before independence in 1968 was illegal. A 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice supported the Mauritian position. Sovereignty negotiations between Mauritius and the United Kingdom have been ongoing but no binding agreement has yet been reached.
From Our Network
Find Property in Mauritius
Search Listings β
π§ Breaking alerts straight to your inbox
